Krishnan v. Kalidoss
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court condoned a 15-day delay in depositing a security amount pursuant to a prior order, accepting petitioner's affidavit explaining a communication gap and the respondent's lack of objection.
What did the court decide?
Delayed payment of deposit pursuant to order dated 22.12.2014 is condoned.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Eighteenth day of July Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
THE HON`BLE MR JUSTICE S. BASKARAN
CMP No.11219 of 2017
IN SA.1101/2014
1 KRISHNAN [ PETITIONER ]
Vs
1 KALIDOSS [ RESPONDENT ]
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 15 days in making the payment of deposit amount pursuant to the order passed in MP.2/2014 in SA.No.1101/2014 dated 22/12/2014.(in CMP No.11219 of 2017)pending disposal of above SA.1101/2014
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. A. TAMILVANAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of M/S.T.S.BASKARAN, Advocate on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay of 15 days in making payment of deposit pursuant to a court order be condoned on grounds of communication gap?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
KRISHNAN
- respondent
KALIDOSS
Coram
S. BASKARAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court