and in respect of the same, a complaint was laid. The eye-witness to the present occurrence examined by the prosecution-P.W.2 stated that he is working as an Advertisement Board Writer and knew the accused and P.W.1 is his brother-in-law. As stated earlier, P.W.2 also stated in his chief examination that the victim P.W.1 was assaulted by the 1st accused at abut 11.30 a.m. by using M.O.1 Knife. While P.W.2 stated that whenever any issue arises in this area or in his family, he used to write complaint, but, he did not write the complaint about the incident which took place in the morning, on the occurrence day, prior to the present occurrence. However, P.W.2 stated that as dictated by him, another person wrote the complaint about the morning incident, but, he does not know as to who that person was. On further crossexamination, P.W.2 stated that he did not dictate the contents, but he was only present along with the said writer. According to P.W.2, it took about half-an-hour to prepare the complaint about the earlier occurrence and the time was about 10.30 a.m. P.W.2 also stated that from the time of lodging the complaint, till the case was registered, all of them remained in the police station.
