In S.A.No.45 of 1999, the High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC as the appellants and respondents did not appear. This default dismissal disposed of the pending appeal.
Second Appeal No.45 of 1999 dismissed for default; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 25.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G. JAYACHANDRAN
S.A.No.45 of 1999 and CMP No.617 of 1999
Vs.
...Respondents
Prayer:- This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree A.S.No.143 of 1995 on the file of Principle District Judge, Vellore, dated 23.10.1997 and made in Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.519 of 1988 on the file of Subordinate District Judge, Vellore, dated 28.03.1995.
For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondents : No Appearance
2
G. JAYACHANDRAN, J.
jv
ORDER
Today, when the matter called, no one represented on behalf of the appellants and the respondents. Even though the name of the appellants
were printed in the cause list, the appellants are also absent.
Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
25.01.2017
jv To
S.A.No.45 of 1999
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Padmavathi Ammal
Mahalakshmi
Punitha
Radhakrishnan
Easwari
Perundevi
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
