Second appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellant's counsel reported no instruction from the client and noted non-pros.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 30.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN
SECOND APPEAL NO.246 OF 1999
Neelavathi represented by her Power of Attorney Agent Chengalvaraya Naidu, S/o Pattabi, Thozhuppedu Village and Post, Madurantakam Taluk, Pin 603 310.
.. Appellant
/versus/
1.Manga Thai 2.Veerasamy 3.Adhilakshmi Ammal 4.Subbammal 5.R.Subbaraya Naidu 6.M.Perumal 7.Munusamy 8.Varadappa Naidu 9.Kanniappa Naidu
..Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree dated 18.12.1998 made in A.s.No.91 of 1998 on the file of the Sub Court, Madurantakam Taluk, reversing the judgment and decree dated 20.03.1998 made in O.S.No.123 of 1994 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurantakam.
For Appellant :Mr.M.S.Subramanian For Respondents :Mr.K.Shakespear for R1 to R6
2
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN,J.
ari
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel appearing for the appellant reports "no instruction" from his client and he has also filed a memo to that effect enclosing copy of the intimation sent to his client along with acknowledgement.
Recording the memo filed by the learned counsel appearing for the appellant, this second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.
30.01.2017
SECOND APPEAL NO.246 OF 1999
30.01.2017
Neelavathi
Manga Thai
Veerasamy
Adhilakshmi Ammal
Subbammal
R.Subbaraya Naidu
G.Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
