Disposed

The Indian Cultural Research v. M.a.M.R.Muthiah

Madras HC4 Dec 2017OSA/217/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In four original side appeals, the Court disposed of the matters after the appellants abondoned the appeals and the respondents confirmed readiness to file written statements. The Court directed respondents to file written statements within four weeks and the suits to be posted for framing issues after six weeks, holding the trial would not be impacted.

What did the court decide?

Written statements directed to be filed by defendants within four weeks; suits posted for framing issues after six weeks; appeals disposed of.

The Indian Cultural Research Vs M.a.M.R.Muthiah — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 04.12.2017

¶4

Coram

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶7

O.S.A.Nos.217, 218, 222 and 223 of 2017

¶8

and C.M.P.Nos.15051, 15052, 15092 and 15093 of 2017

¶9

O.S.A.No.217 of 2017 1. The Indian Cultural Research Trust, Rep. by its Secretary, Mr.AR.Ramaswamy 6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai, Chennai. 2. Mr.AR.Ramaswamy Secretary, The Indian Cultural Research Trust, 6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai, Chennai. ... Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs. 1. Mr.M.A.M.R. Muthiah 2. Mrs.Geetha Muthiah 3. RM.Palaniappan 4. Mrs.V.Valliammal 5. Mr.V.Chandramouleeswaran 6. Mr.V.Palaniappan 7. S.Hariharan 8. V.Vaidyanathan 9. Smt.Kumara Rani Dr.Meena Meena Muthiah ...Respondents/Defendants

¶10

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶11

¶12

O.S.A.No.218 of 2017

¶13

The Willingdon Charitable Trust, Rep. by its Secretary, Mr.AR.Ramaswamy 6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai,

¶14

Chennai – 600 006.

¶15

Mr.AR.Ramaswamy Secretary, The Willingdon Charitable Trust, 6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai, Chennai. ... Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs.

¶16

Mr.M.A.M.R. Muthiah

¶17

Mrs.Geetha Muthiah

¶18

Mr.RM.Palaniappan

¶19

Mrs.V.Valliammal 5. Mr.V.Chandramouleeswaran

¶20

Mr.V.Palaniappan

¶21

Mr.S.Hariharan 8. Mr.Justice V.Rathinam 9. Dr.T.C.Mohan

¶22

10.The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, No16, College Lane, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶23

11.The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104. 12. Mr.V.Vaidyanathan ...Respondents/Defendants

¶24

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶25

¶26

... Appellant/Plaintiff

¶27

O.S.A.No.222 of 2017

¶28

Mr.V.Vaidyanathan

¶29

Vs.

¶30

The Willingdon Charitable Trust, Rep. by its Secretary, Mr.AR.Ramaswamy 6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006.

¶31

Mr.M.A.M.R. Muthiah

¶32

Mrs.Geetha Muthiah

¶33

RM.Palaniappan

¶34

Mrs.V.Valliammal

¶35

Mr.V.Chandramouleeswaran

¶36

Mr.V.Palaniappan

¶37

Mr.S.Hariharan

¶38

Mr.AR. Ramaswamy 10. Mr.Justice V.Rathinam 11. Dr.T.C.Mohan

¶39

The Chief General Manager, State Bank of India, No16, College Lane, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶40

13.The Administrator General and Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu, High Court Buildings, Chennai – 600 104. ...Respondents/Defendants

¶41

O.S.A.No.223 of 2017

¶42

Smt. Kumara Rani Dr.Meena Muthiah ... Appellant/Plaintiff

¶43

Vs.

¶44

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶45

¶46

The Indian Cultural Research Trust, Rep. by its Secretary, Mr.AR.Ramaswamy

¶47

6^th Floor, Rani Seethai Hall, No.603 Anna Salai, Chennai.

¶48

Mr.M.A.M.R. Muthiah

¶49

Mrs.Geetha Muthiah

¶50

Mr.RM.Palaniappan

¶51

Mrs.V.Valliammal

¶52

Mr.V.Chandramouleeswaran

¶53

Mr.V.Palaniappan

¶54

Mr.S.Hariharan

¶55

Mr.AR. Ramaswamy

¶56

Mr.V.Vaidyanathan

¶57

...Respondents/Defendants

¶58

PRAYER in O.S.A.No.217 of 2016: Original Side Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2017 passed in O.A.No.535 of 2017 in C.S.No.388 of 2017 and allow the present Original Side Appeal as prayed for.

¶59

PRAYER in O.S.A.No.218 of 2016: Original Side Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2017 passed in O.A.No.536 of 2017 in C.S.No.389 of 2017 and allow the present Original Side Appeal as prayed for.

¶60

Appellant in : Ms. A.R.L. Sundaresan, Sr. Counsel OSA.Nos.217 & for Ms.A.L.Ganthimathi 218 of 2017 Respondents in : Mr. A.C.Somaiyaji, Sr. Counsel OSA.Nos.217 & for Mr.M.Sureshkumar – R1 & 2 218 of 2017 Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Sr. Counsel for Mr.M.Praveenkumar – R3 Mr.V.Raghavachari, Sr. Counsel for Mr.D.Manimaran – R.4 Mr.T.Mohan for Mr.R.I.Ramesh – R5 to 7

¶61

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶62

¶63

PRAYER in O.S.A.No.222 of 2016: Original Side Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2017 passed in O.A.No.532 of 2017 in C.S.No.386 of 2017 and allow the present Original Side Appeal as prayed for.

¶64

PRAYER in O.S.A.No.223 of 2016: Original Side Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 11.08.2017 passed in O.A.No.533 of 2017 in C.S.No.387 of 2017 and allow the present Original Side Appeal as prayed for.

¶65

Appellant in : Ms. Chitra Sampath, Sr. Counsel
OSA.Nos.222 & for Ms.Sithirai Anandam
223 of 2017
Respondents in : Mr. A.L.Somaiyaji, Sr. Counsel
OSA.Nos.222 & for Mr.M.Sureshkumar – R2, 3
223 of 2017 Mr.M.S.Krishnan, Sr. Counsel
for Mr.M.Praveenkumar – R4
Mr.V.Raghavachari, Sr. Counsel
for Mr.D.Manimaran – R.5
Mr.R.I.Ramesh – R6, 7 & 8
C O M M O N J U D G M E N T
( Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J)

¶66

Mr.Sundaresan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants

¶67

does not wish to press the captioned appeals. Further, the learned Snior Counsel says that directions can be issued to expedite the completion of

¶68

pleadings in the suit.

¶69

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶70

¶71

Mr.A.L.Somaiyaji and Mr.Ragavachari, learned Senior Counsels

¶72

appearing on behalf of the respondents say that they would have no difficulty in filing their written statements in the suits.

¶73

Accordingly, the defendants in the pending suits, will file their

¶74

written statement within four (4) weeks. The suits will be posted before the

¶75

Single Judge after six (6) weeks for framing of issues and thereafter, for
disposal as per law.
4. With these aforesaid directions, the captioned appeals are disposed
of. It is needless to say that trial of the suits will not have any impact in the
judgment or any observations made during the pendency of these appeals.
(R.S.A.J.) (N.S.K., J.)
04.12.2017
Index : yes/no
vrc
To
The Administrator General and
Official Trustee of Tamil Nadu,
High Court Buildings,
Chennai – 600 104.

¶76

http://www.judis.nic.in

¶77

¶78

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. and N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶79

O.S.A.Nos.217, 218, 222
and 223 of 2017
04.12.2017

¶80

http://www.judis.nic.in

The Indian Cultural Research v. M.a.M.R.Muthiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Indian Cultural Research v. M.a.M.R.Muthiah

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Karthi, Vs the Inspector of Police

SEENUVASAN,M/46 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police

Amala, Female/Aged 28 Years Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Its

G. Kuppan Vs State Rep. by

Latha, F/45 Yrs. Vs State Rep. by

Yasmin, Vs the Superintendent of Police