Disposed

Yasmin, v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC4 Dec 2017HCP/2127/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed for Habeas Corpus regarding detenu Abdul Rahman. Court produced the detenu and interviewed him regarding his relationship. Finding him not in illegal custody and of majority age, the court closed the petition. No orders were passed on custody restoration.

What did the court decide?

Petition closed and consigned to record. Detenu produced. No order on custody restoration issued as he was not in illegal custody.

Yasmin, Vs the Superintendent of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶2

Dated : 04.12.2017

¶3

Coram

¶4

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER & THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR H.C.P.No.2127 of 2017

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Yasmin

¶7

... Petitioner/Mother of the Detenue

¶8

Vs.
1. The Superintendent of Police
Villupuram R.P. District
Villupuram
2. The Inspector of Police
F4, Kiliyanur Police Station
Villupuram R.P. District
3. Mr.K.V.N.Venkatesan
... Respondents

¶9

PRAYER:Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 1^st and 2^nd respondents to produce the detenu Abdul Rahman, S/o.abdul Hameed from the illegal custody of 3^rd respondent before this Court and restore the legal custody of the detenu.

¶10

For Petitioner : Mr.I.Abdul Basith

¶11

For Respondent : Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran,

¶12

Addl. Public Prosecutor.

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

(Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.)

¶15

The detenu, Mr.Abdul Rahman, has been produced in Court.

¶16

The petitioner is the mother of the detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman.

¶17

The detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman, says, he will return to his mother, i.e., the petitioner.

¶18

3.1. We have interacted with the detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman.

¶19

3.2. Our interaction with the detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman revealed that he had entered into a relationship with one,

¶20

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶21

Ms.Kousalya.

¶22

3.3.Ms.Kousalya is also present in Court. We have

¶23

interviewed her as well.

¶24

3.4.The detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman, says that he is 25 years of age and he would wish to marry Ms.Kousalya.

¶25

3.5.The petitioner, says, she has no objection, if the detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman, wants to marry Ms.Kousalya.

¶26

4.At present, the detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman is not in illegal custody.

¶27

4.1.The detenu/Mr.Abdul Rahman and Ms.Kousalya are free, to take a decision concerning their lives, as both of them have crossed the age of majority.

¶28

Accordingly, the petition is closed and consigned to
record.
s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS IV)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
kas
To
1. The Superintendent of Police
Villupuram R.P. District
Villupuram
2. The Inspector of Police
F4, Kiliyanur Police Station
Villupuram R.P. District
3. The Public Prosecutor
High Court of Madras
Madras
+1 CC to Mr.I.Abdul Basith , Advocate sr 86211.

¶29

H.C.P.No.2127 of 2017

¶30

SP(28/12/2017)

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Yasmin, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yasmin, v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Karthi, Vs the Inspector of Police

SEENUVASAN,M/46 Yrs Vs the Inspector of Police

Amala, Female/Aged 28 Years Vs State of Tamilnadu, Rep.by Its

The Indian Cultural Research Vs M.a.M.R.Muthiah

G. Kuppan Vs State Rep. by

Latha, F/45 Yrs. Vs State Rep. by