Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking habeas corpus for her daughter, who was detained. The court noted the detenue is married to one of the respondents and expressed her desire to remain with him. Consequently, no further orders were passed and the petition was closed.
No further orders; the petition is closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 04.12.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
H.C.P.No.2293 of 2017
Latha ... Petitioner
-vs-
State Rep by:
1.Superintendent of Police,
Chengalpet District,
Chengalpet.
2.Inspector of Police,
Chengalpet Police Station,
Chengalpet District.
3.Inspector of Police,
Irumbulikurichi Police Station,
Sendurai TK,
Ariyalur District.
4.A.Prabakaran
5.Annadurai
6.S.Vinothkumar
7.S.Saravanan
8.Arul Kodi
9.S.Vinothkumar
10.Smt.Selvam
11.Manimaran
12.Vasuki ...Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to produce the detenue, i.e., the petitioner's daughter P.Porkodi or bring the corpus of the detenue before this Court and set her at liberty from the 4th respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijayakumar For Respondents: Mr.V.M.R.Rajentran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1 to R3
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.]
1.This is a fresh matter. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, however, says that since complaint was lodged, which is numbered as CSR No.464 of 2017. The detenue/Ms.P.Porkodi was traced.
1.1.Accordingly, Mr.Rajentran, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, says that the detenue/Ms.P.Porkodi is available for interaction.
2.Heard. Mr.P.Vijayakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, concedes that the detenue/Ms.P.Porkodi has married the 4th respondent i.e., Mr.A.Prabakaran.
3.To be noted even, according to the petitioner, the detenue/Ms.P.Porkodi is a 4th year student of College of Nursing, Government Chengalpet Medical College & Hospital, Chengalpattu and therefore, is a mature person who can make her own choices in life.
4.The detenue/Ms.P.Porkodi says that she is married and has expressed her desire to remain in the company of the 4th respondent, i.e., Mr.A.Prabakaran.
5.In these circumstances, no further orders need to be passed in the instant petition. It is directed, accordingly. The petition is closed.
-s/d-
Assistant Registrar(CS-IV)
True Copy
Sub-Assistant Registrar
pam
To:
Chengalpet.
3.The Public Prosecutor,
Madras High Court,
Madras.
H.C.P.No.2293 of 2017
SJ(CO)
rsi (03/02/2018)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the relief of habeas corpus regarding the detenue.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Latha
The State represented by Superintendent of Police
A.Prabakaran
RAJIV SHAKDHER
N.SATHISH KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
