Raj D Mani v. K.v.Suresh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Madras dismissed a suit as withdrawn upon counsel's submission that the matter was settled. The Court ordered refund of the entire court fee as the trial had not commenced.
What did the court decide?
Suit dismissed as withdrawn. Entire court fee refunded to the plaintiff.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 08.12.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
C.S.No.317 of 2013 Raj D.Mani Represented by his Power Agent Mr.C.Ezhilan .. Plaintiff ..Vs.. K.V.Suresh ..Defendant
Plaint filed under Order IV Rule 1 of O.S.Rules and r/w Order VII
Rule 1 C.P.C. praying to pass a judgment and decree:-
a) directing the Defendant to pay the plaintiff a sum of Rs.29,80,788/- together with interest at the rate of 18% per annum on Rs.16,61,835/- from the date of plaint till till the date of realisation:-
b)Costs of the suit. For cost of this suit;
For Plaintiff : Mr.K.N.Pandian
for Mr.A.N.Sivaprakasam
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to allow the plaintiff's application for withdrawal of the suit filed under Order VII Rule 1 CPC.
Whether to order refund of court fees under Section 69 of the Tamil Nadu Court Fees and Suit Valuation Act, 1955.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj D.Mani
- respondent
K.V.Suresh
- petitioner
Mr.A.N.Sivaprakasam
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court