Disposed

K.Palanisamy v. M/S Janatha Paper Packaging

Madras HC13 Mar 2017CRP/740/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court, under Article 227, directed the trial court to mark a plaint from a connected suit and dispose of the long-pending suit within a week. The petition challenging the dismissal of applications to recall a witness was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to produce a certified copy of plaint for marking by the trial court on 16.03.2017 and to dispose of the suit on or before 31.03.2017.

K.Palanisamy Vs M/S Janatha Paper Packaging — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 13.03.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY

¶6

C.R.P.(PD).Nos.740 & 934 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.3675 of 2017 in C.R.P.(PD).No.740 of 2017

¶7

K.Palanisamy

¶8

... Petitioner in both C.R.Ps

¶9

Vs.

¶10

1.M/s.Janatha Paper Packaging, a Partnership Firm rep by its Managing Director, K.Jayaraman residing at No.226, K.P.R. Layout, 7^th Cross, Singanallur, Coimbatore – 641 005.

¶11

2.K.Jayaraman

¶12

3.K.Selvaraj

¶13

... Respondents in both C.R.Ps

¶14

Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and final order made in I.A.Nos.616 & 617 of 2016 in O.S.No.291 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

¶15

For Petitioner in both C.R.Ps : Mr.M.R.Thangavel For Respondents in both C.R.Ps : Ms.P.T.Asha, for M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates

¶16

¶17

C O M M O N O R D E R

¶18

Challenging the fair and final order passed in I.A.Nos.616 & 617 of 2016 in O.S.No.291 of 2004 on the file of the II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petitions.

¶19

2.The plaintiff filed the suit in O.S.No.291 of 2004 for permanent injunction. The defendants filed their written statement and are contesting the suit.

¶20

3.After framing the issues, the trial Court took up the matter for trial and after the completion of the oral evidence, the plaintiff filed applications in I.A.Nos.616 and 617 of 2016 to reopen and recall D.W.2 for further cross examination. The said applications were contested by the defendants stating that there is no necessity for further cross examining the witness. The trial Court, taking into consideration the case of both parties, dismissed both the applications, against which the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision Petitions.

¶21

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner/plaintiff

¶22

¶23

submitted that the plaintiff sought for further examination of D.W.2 only for the purpose of marking the plaint in O.S.No.1242 of 2010 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Coimbatore. Further, the learned counsel submitted that recalling of D.W.2 is not for any other purpose other than what has been stated.

¶24

5.Ms.P.T.Asha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents/ defendants submitted that the defendants have no objection for marking the certified copy of the plaint in O.S.No.1242 of 2010 and in such a case, the said document can be produced before the trial Court and the same can be marked by the trial Court without recording any evidence on the side of the defendants. Further, the learned counsel submitted that the suit is posted for arguments today (i.e.) 13.03.2017.

¶25

6.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, since the respondents/defendants have no objection for marking the certified copy of the plaint in O.S.No.1242 of 2010 as plaintiff's side document, the petitioner/plaintiff is directed to produce the document before the trial Court on 16.03.2017 and the trial Court is directed to mark the said document as plaintiff's side exhibit on the same day.

¶26

¶27

7.Since the suit is pending for a long time, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.291 of 2004 on or before 31.03.2017 .

¶28

8.With these observations, the Civil Revision Petitions are disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶29

Index : No Internet : Yes va Note: Issue order copy on 14.03.2017.

¶30

13.03.2017

¶31

¶32

The II Additional District Munsif Court, Coimbatore.

M.DURAISWAMY,J.

C.R.P.(PD).Nos.740 & 934 of 2017 and C.M.P.No.3675 of 2017 in C.R.P.(PD).No.740 of 2017

¶37

13.03.2017

¶38

http://www.judis.nic.in

K.Palanisamy v. M/S Janatha Paper Packaging

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Palanisamy v. M/S Janatha Paper Packaging

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mrs. U. Srisuganaya @ Vs M. Arulraj

K. Radhalakshmi Vs M/S. Thirupathy

K. Balaboopathy Vs Vikram K. Jain

Revathi Vs P. Ravikumar

Julanda Premila Vs a.John Morries(a)Morris

Mr.B.Gulgresh Vs Mrs.Gayathri Devi