The High Court at Madras dismissed the Criminal Revision Petition as it had been withdrawn by the petitioner, who sought the court's permission for withdrawal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.03.2017
Coram
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN
Crl. Revision Case No.393 of 2014
K.S. Rajendran .. Petitioner
Versus
Leelawathy .. Respondent
Revision Petition filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 of Cr.P.C. to the District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court Paramathy, Namakkal District, M.C.No.12/2007 dated 07.12.2013, is otherwise illegal, irregular, improper, unsustainable and in any event liable to set aside.
For Petitioner : Ms. Sumithra Vasudevan For Respondent : Mr. K. Kannan
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission
of this Court to withdraw this Criminal Revision Petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
2 .In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learned
counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
13.03.2017
pam/mrp
To
The District Munsiff cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Paramathy, Namakkal District.
V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.
mrp
Crl.R.C. No. 393 of 2014
13.03.2017
K.S. Rajendran
Leelawathy
V. BHARATHIDASAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
