Khaleel Ahmed v. Masjid-E-Ahrar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as default due to the petitioner's non-appearance and lack of representation on the date of hearing.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 24.01.2017
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.V.MURALIDARAN
C.R.P.No.1970 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012 Khaleel Ahmed .. Petitioner Vs Masjid-e-Ahrar Rep. by its Muthavalli Mr.G.Mohammed Usman No.9, Kathbada 2nd Cross Lane, Old Washermanpet, Chennai-21. .. Respondent
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code, to Revise the order of the trial Court in Ejectment suit No.12 of 2008 by the IVth Judge, Court of Small Causes at Chennai, against the Judgment and decree dated 28.02.2011.
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.S.Natana Rajan
O R D E R
On 18.01.2017, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the same was posted today (24.01.2017) under the caption "for dismissal". Even today when the matter was called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Khaleel Ahmed
- respondent
Masjid-e-Ahrar Rep. by its Muthavalli Mr.G.Mohammed Usman
Coram
M.V.Muralidaran
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court