Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Kodakaran Vs Kuppuraj — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

Home
Madras HC
2017
Kodakaran Vs KuppurajKodakaran v. Kuppuraj

Dismissed

Kodakaran v. Kuppuraj

Madras HC23 Jan 2017CRP/3308/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court dismissed a civil revision petition as infructuous because the underlying suit was dismissed, rendering the prayer surviving nothing.

What did the court decide?

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated:23.01.2017

CORAM

The Hon'ble Mr.Justice M.V.MURALIDARAN

CRP(PD).No.3308 of 2012

Kodakaran

.. Petitioner

Kuppuraj .. Respondent

Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair order and decreetal order dated 02.07.2012 made in I.A.No.99 of 2012 in O.S.No.151 of 2009 on the file of District Munsif, Dharmapuri.

For Petitioner :M/s.I.Abrar Mohamed Abdullah For Respondent :M/s.C.Prabakaran

2

M.V.MURALIDARAN, J.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Kodakaran
respondent
Kuppuraj

Coram

AI extract

M.V.Muralidaran

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Madras HC
Decided on: 23 Jan 2017 · January
Registered: 11 Sept 2012
Case no.: CRP/3308/2012

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from M.v. Muralidaran

K.Mohanraj Vs Venkatachalam
20 Jan 2017
M. Manikandan, Vs the Sub Registrar
20 Jan 2017
M. Thangadurai, Vs the District Collector
20 Jan 2017
Chinnadurai Vs Karuppannan
23 Jan 2017

Cite this judgement

Kodakaran v. Kuppuraj, CRP/3308/2012 (MAD), decided on 23 January 2017.

The Madras High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

M.V.Muralidaran

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Civil Revision Petition dismissed as infructuous; connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Held that where the underlying suit itself has been dismissed, no prayer survives in the subsequent civil revision petition. Consequently, the revision petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

ub

O R D E R

It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the suit itself is dismissed. Therefore, nothing survives in the Civil revision petition. Hence, the prayer in the civil revision petition has become infructuous.

Recording the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as one having become infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

23.01.2017

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No ub To

The District Munsif, Dharmapuri.

CRP(PD).No.3308 of 2012

3

http://www.judis.nic.in

CNR

HCMA011122052012

Topic

Civil Procedure and Limitation

Bench

M.v. Muralidaran

Disposal

DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS

N.Munusamy Vs K.R.Ravi

23 Jan 2017

Erode Dist. Cricket Asso. Vs Inspector General of

23 Jan 2017