Archunan v. Chinasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Judicature at Madras, as the underlying suit had already been disposed of.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :12.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
C.R.P.(PD).No.1092 of 2017
and
C.M.P.No.19635 of 2017
Archunan ... Petitioner/Plaintiff/
Petitioner
-vs-
1.Chinasamy
2.Dhandapani ... Respondents/Defendants/
Respondents
PRAYER:
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 19.10.2016 passed in I.A.No.334 of 2016 in O.S.No.1121 of 2009 on the file of the District Munsif of Sankarapuram.
For Petitioner : M/s. S. Ramajayam *****
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of
this Court to withdraw this Revision Petition as the suit in O.S.No.1121 of 2009 itself has been disposed of and has also
made an endorsement in the petition to that effect.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Archunan
- respondent
Chinasamy
- respondent
Dhandapani
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court