Disposed

S.Nagaraj v. the Commissioner of Police

Madras HC10 Jul 2017CRL OP(MD)/8134/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench directed the Commissioner of Police to complete investigation and file a final report on a fraud case involving a fake vehicle registration within three months, noting the identity of the accused was already known.

What did the court decide?

Directed the first respondent to complete investigation and file a final report within three months of receiving a copy of this order.

S.Nagaraj Vs the Commissioner of Police — Cheating and Forgery | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 10.07.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

Crl.O.P(MD) No.8134 of 2017

S.Nagaraj

... Petitioner

-vs-

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶11

The Inspector of Police, C2-Subramaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai City. ... Respondents

¶12

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying this Court to direct the respondents to file a final report/charge sheet in Crime No.130 of 2017 dated 24.02.2017 within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Rajaprabu For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan

¶14

Government Advocate (Crl.side)

¶15

O R D E R

¶16

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to file a final report/charge sheet in Crime No.130 of 2017 dated 24.02.2017 within the period stipulated by this Court.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondents.

¶18

The petitioner is the defacto complainant and gave a criminal complaint against the brother-in-law of the petitioner. According to the petitioner, he purchased a car from his brother-inlaw and transferred the R.C Book to his name. When the petitioner approached the United India Insurance Company, Madurai for renewal of the insurance of the said vehicle, he came to know that the vehicle's registration number is fake. Thereafter, immediately the petitioner lodged a complaint before the second respondent against his brother-in-law. However, no further action was taken after the registration of FIR. This lead the petitioner to approach this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court for direction to the respondents to file charge sheet and final report.

¶19

¶20

As per the complaint registered, the petitioner purchased a TATA Sumo Gold Ex 2013 bearing registration No. TN 31 AU 3637 through his brother-in-law. However, when he moved for transfer of the registration of the vehicle to his name it was noticed that the Registration number is actually pertaining to another car of SANTRO DLX model-2011. Hence, the petitioner could not do the renewal of insurance because of giving a forged registration certificate for the vehicle. In such circumstances, the identity of the person, who sold the vehicle to the petitioner is known and the nature of offence committed in also known from the complaint.

¶21

Though the registration of the case was on 24.02.2017, there was no progress. Taking into consideration the facts alleged in the complaint and the disclosure of the person, who had committed the offence as per the complaint, this Court is inclined to give a direction to the first respondent to complete the investigation and file a final report, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶22

Hence this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with the above direction. No costs.

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

Assistant Registrar (AD-II)

¶25

/True Copy/

¶26

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶27

¶28

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madeira.

¶29

The Inspector of Police,

¶30

C2-Subramaniyapuram Police Station, Madurai City.

¶31

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

1 CC TO Mr.S.RAJABRABU, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 64820

¶33

TA/CP

¶34

TE/SKN-RSK/SAR-III : 21/07/2017 : 2P/5C

¶35

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.8134 of 2017

¶36

10.07.2017

¶37

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

S.Nagaraj v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Nagaraj v. the Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M.Seenivasan Vs the Commissioner of Police

Karthik Raja Vs the Inspector of Police

G. Shiyam Shankar Vs the Commissioner of Police

Rengammal, Vs the Superintendent of Police

C.Rajathangam Vs the Superintendent of Police

N.Kannan Vs the Superintendent of Police