Rengammal petitioner filed this Cr.O.P. seeking police protection. The Court found that the committee had recommended protection and the police had already provided it as requested. The petition was thus declared infructuous and closed without further direction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
Rengammal
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.07.2017 CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR Crl.O.P(MD) No.7322 of 2017
Rengammal ... Petitioner -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District.
2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keeranur Sub-Division, Pudukottai District.
3.The Inspector Of Police, Ponammaravathy Police Station, Pudhukottai District.
4.Inspector of Police, Panayampatty Police Station, Pudukottai District. 5.P.C.Santhuran, 6.C.Muthu ...Respondents 7.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Principal Secretary, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai. 8.The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.
10.The District Officer, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Office of the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Pudhukottai, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Pudhukottai District. .. Respondents Nos.7 to 10/ Proposed Respondents Nos.7 to 10
2
(Respondents 7 to 10 are impleaded
as respondents vide Court order dated 10.07.2017 made in Crl.OP(MD) 7322/17)
Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying this Court to direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner and her husband.
For Petitioner : Mr.R.Alagumani
For RR 1 to 4 : Mr.K.Anbarasan
Government Advocate (Crl.side)
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner and her husband.
2.Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondents 1 to 4.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(Crl.Side)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Pudhukottai District.
3
4.Inspector of Police, Panayampatty Police Station, Pudukottai District.
5.The Principal Secretary, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.
6.The Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai.
8.The District Officer, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Office of the Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Pudhukottai,Pudhukottai District.
JS/GT/SAR.1/1.8.2017/3P-10C
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.7322 of 2017 10.07.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct respondent Nos. 1 to 4 to provide police protection to the petitioner and her husband.
Rengammal
Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, Pudukottai District
Deputy Superintendent of Police, Office of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keeranur Sub-Division, Pudukottai District
Inspector Of Police, Ponammaravathy Police Station, Pudhukottai District
Inspector of Police, Panayampatty Police Station, Pudukottai District
State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by, The Principal Secretary, Adi Dravidar and Tribal Welfare Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai
S.S. Sundar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
