Petitioner, accused in a criminal case, sought withdrawal of a bail petition. The court recorded the withdrawal and dismissed the petition without substantive adjudication on bail principles.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Tuesday, the Sixth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
CRL OP(MD) No.5576 of 2017
VIGNESWARAN ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED (SINGLE)
Vs
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT
CRIME NO. 120 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.M.PITCHAI MUTHU Advocate
For Respondent : MR.R.RAMACHANDRAN,
Additional Public Prosecutor,( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has made an endorsement to that effect.
Recording the same, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/06/06/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUPATTI POLICE STATION,MADURAI DISTRICT.
PJL
CSL/BS/SAR-II/06.06.2017 : 2P/5C
ORDER
IN
VIGNESWARAN
THE STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KADUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT
G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
