Partly allowed

C.Ajith v. State through

Madras HC6 Jun 2017CRL MP(MD)/4352/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai bench of Madras High Court relaxed bail conditions imposed in a prior order, directing the petitioner to appear for police interrogation as required during the pendency of the case, provided the applicant continues regular compliance. The petition was disposed of accordingly. Order granted June 6, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner is complying with previously imposed conditi

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the earlier bail condition directing the petitioner to appear for interrogation as and when required by police.

C.Ajith Vs State through — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Sixth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.4352 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4740 of 2017

¶6

C.AJITH ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARAIKUDI NORTH POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶9

(CRIME NO. 207/2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the conditions on the petitioners in Crl.O.P(MD). No.4740/2017 dated 20/04/2017.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.M.SANJAY, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.C.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner is present.

¶13

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is complying with the conditions imposed by this Court regularly.

¶14

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the earlier condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

06/06/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KARAIKUDI.

¶21

2 -DO- THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI

¶22

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARAIKUDI NORTH POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.M.SANJAY Advocate SR.No.23193

¶25

MKV-CM-MSA-SAR 1/7.6.2017/2P-6C

¶26

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

C.Ajith v. State through

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

C.Ajith v. State through

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliyaperumal, Vs Durairajan

Srhi Mohamed Syed Mustafa Vs the Superintendent of Customes

Karuppasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

N. Arumugam Vs Uma Maheswari

Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Vigneswaran Vs the Inspector of Police