Allowed

Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC6 Jun 2017CRL MP(MD)/4333/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought to relax bail conditions imposed in a related criminal order. The court recalled that the petitioner was complying with conditions and the charge sheet was filed. It relaxed the earlier condition, directing the petitioner to appear only upon receipt of a summons.

What did the court decide?

The earlier condition imposed by the order dated 13/04/2017 is relaxed; the petitioner shall appear before the concerned court on receipt of summons.

Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Sixth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.4333 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.4265 of 2017 KUMAR ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶6

¶7

STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAR POLICE STATION, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶8

CRIME NO. 36 OF 2015 ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by the order dated 13/04/2017 passed in Crl.O.P.(MD) No.4265 of 2017 and thus render justice.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.N.PRAGALATHAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.C.RAMACHANDRAN, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is present.

¶12

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and charge sheet was filed and the same yet to be taken on file by the concerned Court.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the

¶15

earlier condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶16

sd/06/06/2017

¶17

/ TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II,NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶21

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶22

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOTTAR POLICE STATION,NAGERCOIL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S.N.PRAGALATHAN Advocate SR.No.23537

¶25

PJL

¶26

CSL/BS/SAR-I/09.06.2017 : 2P/6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumar v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaliyaperumal, Vs Durairajan

Srhi Mohamed Syed Mustafa Vs the Superintendent of Customes

Karuppasamy Vs the Inspector of Police

N. Arumugam Vs Uma Maheswari

C.Ajith Vs State through

Vigneswaran Vs the Inspector of Police