Disposed

D.Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC11 Jul 2017CRL OP(MD)/5123/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court disposed of a Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. directing the Commissioner of Police to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.479 of 2013 within three months from the date of receipt of the order copy.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 2nd respondent to complete investigation and file final report in Crime No.479 of 2013 within three months.

D.Sureshkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 11.07.2017

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD).No.5123 of 2017

¶7

D.Sureshkumar .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station,

¶10

Madurai District.

¶11

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai. .. Respondents

¶12

PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 2^nd respondent to complete the investigation and to file final report in Crime No.479 of 2013 on the file of the 2^nd respondent within a time frame.

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vinayagan For Respondents : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Criminal side)

¶14

ORDER

¶15

This petition is filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to file a final report in Crime No.479 of 2013 within a time frame.

¶16

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.

¶17

3.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), on instructions, would submit that though the case was closed by filing final report on 21.05.2013, as per the directions of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai, re-investigation is going on. He further submitted that the second respondent requires three months time to complete the investigation and to file the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ final report in Crime No.479 of 2013.

¶18

¶19

4.Recording the undertaking given by the learned Government

¶20

Advocate (Criminal Side), this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to complete the investigation and to file the final report in Crime No.479 of 2013, before the Court concerned within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

Assistant Registrar(CS-I)

¶23

/True Copy/

¶24

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶25

¶26

1.The Inspector of Police, Tallakulam Police Station, Madurai District.

¶27

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

Crl.O.P(MD)No.5123 of 2017

¶29

PJL

¶30

JM/SKN RSK/SAR 1/21.07.2017/2P/3C

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

D.Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Sureshkumar, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rengammal, Vs the Superintendent of Police

S.Nagaraj Vs the Commissioner of Police

C.Rajathangam Vs the Superintendent of Police

K.K.S.V.T. Subburaj Vs the Inspector of Police

N.S.Kalirajan Vs the Superintendent of Police

Micheal Lenis, Vs the Inspector of Police