Allowed

Ramesh v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Apr 2017CRL OP(MD)/4315/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail petition filed by a sole accused facing charges under the NDPS Act for possession of ganja. The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court granted anticipatory bail subject to specific conditions, including execution of a bond and daily appearance before the police.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties; ordered to appear daily before police; must appear before Magistrate within 15 days.

Ramesh Vs the Sub Inspector of Police — Narcotics (NDPS) | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.4315 of 2017

¶6

RAMESH ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶7

STATE THROUGH

¶8

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE VALANTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT,

¶9

CRIME NO. 32 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶10

For Petitioner : M/S.A.CHELLAMANI Advocate

¶11

For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶12

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶13

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶14

The petitioner, who is the sole accused, in Crime No.32 of 2017 on the file of the respondent police, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(B) of NDPS Act and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

¶15

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

¶16

The learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side) on instructions submitted that on 02.02.2017 when the respondent police was on raid, the petitioner was intercepted by them and at once, the petitioner ran away from the place leaving a gunny bag and in search, they found 1.150 kgs. Of ganja in that bag. Hence, the present case has been registered against the petitioner. She further submitted that the petitioner is not having any previous case.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Principal Special and Additional District Judge for

¶18

EC and NDPS Act Cases, Madurai and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously

¶19

5.The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/-

20/04/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶24

¶25

1 THE PRINCIPAL SPECIAL AND ADDITINAL DISTRICT JUDGE FOR EC AND NDPS ACT CASES, MADURAI.

¶26

2 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶27

VALANTHUR POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT,

¶28

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶29

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

+1. CC to M/S.A.CHELLAMANI Advocate SR.No.20809 PM

¶31

GJM/KKR/SAR-III/24.04.2017 : 2P/5C

¶32

ORDER

¶33

¶34

CRL OP(MD) No.4315 of 2017 Date :20/04/2017

¶35

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Ramesh v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh v. the Sub Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Venmani, Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohammed Rafeeq, Vs State Rep. by

P.Sathish Kumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Kumaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Bhagyalakshmi Vs the Inspector of Police