Allowed

Venmani, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC19 Apr 2017CRL OP(MD)/14771/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench converted an interim order granting anticipatory bail to an absolute order for three accused persons. The court noted prior compliance, including deposit of a sum and impleadment of a complainant, and cited pending investigation as the reason for maintaining bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

The interim anticipatory bail order granted earlier was made absolute; petitioners directed to comply with conditions.

Venmani, Vs the Inspector of Police — Anticipatory Bail | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Nineteenth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CRL OP(MD) No.14771 of 2016

¶6

1 VENMANI

¶7

2 RAMESH RAJA @ RASTHA RAMESH 3 KAPIL DEV PANDIAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 3

¶8

1 THE STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶9

CRIME NO.48/2016

¶10

2 MARUTHAMUTHU ... RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANTS

¶11

(*)R2 IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT MADE IN CRL MP(MD)No.130/2017 IN CRL OP(MD)No.14771 of 2016, DATED 19.04.2017 BY JNBJ)

¶12

For Petitioners : M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate

¶13

For Respondents : MRS.S.PRABHA, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)

¶14

PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.

¶15

ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-

¶16

The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 to A3 in Crime No.48 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 420 IPC and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

¶17

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent/State.

¶18

3.The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that this https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Court, by order dated 06.09.2016, has already been granted interim anticipatory bail in favour of these petitioners and they have also surrendered and executed sureties before the learned Judicial

¶19

Magistrate, Karaikudi. As per the direction of this Court, by order dated 15.11.2016, the petitioners have also deposited a sum of Rs.1 lakh to the credit of Crime No.48 of 2016 and also filed petition for impleading the defacto complainant. Though notice has been served, the second respondent/defacto complainant did not appear before the Court. The civil case has been given criminal colour. Therefore, this petition may be ordered.

¶20

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent / Police submitted that the petitioners have deposited a sum of Rs.1 lakh to the credit of Crime No.48 of 2016. The investigation is pending.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the interim anticipatory bail order already granted by this Court is made absolute. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

sd/-

19/04/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶26

Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶27

Madurai - 625 023.

¶28

¶29

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KARAIKUDI.

¶30

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI.

¶31

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶32

SOMANATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, KARAIKUDI TALUK, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶33

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,

¶34

MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶35

+1. CC to M/S.M.JEGADEESH PANDIAN Advocate SR.No.20505

¶36

GCG

¶37

MS/PM-PN/SAR II/26.04.2017: 2P/6C

¶38

ORDER

¶39

¶40

CRL OP(MD) No.14771 of 2016

¶41

Date :19/04/2017

¶42

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Venmani, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Venmani, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

J.Mohammed Asarudeen, Vs the Inspector of Police

P.Sekar, Vs the Inspector of Police

G.Radhakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Vijayakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Mohammed Rafeeq, Vs State Rep. by

Mathew Vs the Inspector of Police