P.Sathish Kumar, v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madras High Court considered a petition seeking relaxation of conditions imposed in a prior order. Noting the petitioner's regular compliance for five weeks, the Court extended the compliance period for another three weeks followed by police interrogation.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner is directed to comply with the conditions imposed by the Court on 16.03.2017 for another three weeks, after which he shall appear before the police.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Thursday, the Twentieth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
CRL MP(MD) No.3339 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2966 of 2017
P.SATHISH KUMAR, ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER
Vs
THE STATE BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.KALLUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO.59 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on him in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2966 of 2017 dated 16.03.2017 and thus render justice.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.VENKATESH, Advocate for the petitioner MRS.S.PRABHA Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the Respondent the court made the following order:-
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be extended time to comply with bail conditions imposed by the Court.
Whether the petitioner has satisfactorily complied with the bail conditions for the past five weeks.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
P.SATHISH KUMAR
- respondent
THE STATE BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T.KALLUPATTI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT
Coram
J.NISHA BANU
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court