S.Manimekala @ Esakkiyammal, v. the Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Dismissed. The petitions were dismissed as withdrawn upon the petitioner's counsel seeking permission to withdraw.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twentieth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
CRL OP(MD) Nos.3107 to 3109 of 2017
1 S.MANIMEKALA @ ESAKKIYAMMAL, 2 S.JOTHI, ... PETITIONERS / PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED NO.1 & 2 IN ALL THE PETITIONS
Vs
STATE REP.BY
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VK PURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT. ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT IN ALL THE PETITIONS Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 3107/ 2017 :
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Modify the conditions imposed in the CRMP No.678 of 2017, dated 15.02.2017 in Crime No.28 of 2017 by the Hnourable Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 3108/ 2017 : Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Modify the conditions imposed in the CRMP No.679 of 2017, dated 15.02.2017 in Crime No.27 of 2017 by the Hnourable Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram.
Prayer in CRL OP(MD). 3109/ 2017 :
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Modify the conditions imposed in the CRMP No.680 of 2017, dated 15.02.2017 in Crime No.26 of 2017 by the Hnourable Judicial Magistrate, Ambasamudram.
Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of
Mr.R.SANTHANAM Advocate Advocate for the petitioner in all the
petitions and of Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent in all the petitions, the court made the following order:-
Learned counsel for the petitioners made an endorsement to the effect that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions. In view of the same, these petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
sd/20/03/2017 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, AMBASAMUDRAM
2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VK PURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI
SM:PM-PN:SAR 3:23.03.2017:2p/5c
ORDER
IN
CRL OP(MD) Nos.3107 TO 3109 of 2017 Date :20/03/2017
S. MANIMEKALA @ ESAKKIYAMMAL & ANR.
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VK PURAM POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT & ORS.
G. Jayachandran
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court