Vinoth v. the Sub Inspector of Police
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as not pressed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )
Monday, the Twentieth day of March Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN
CRL OP(MD) No.2932 of 2017
1 VINOTH 2 SIVASANKAR 3 VIGNESH ... PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 1 TO 3
Vs
STATE REP.BY
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, EATHAMOZHI POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.28 OF 2017)
... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : M/S.J.JAWAHAR Advocate
For Respondent :M/S K.V.RAJARAJAN,Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side)
PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec. 439 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Learned counsel for the petitioners made on endorsement to the effect that he is not pressing this petition. In view of the same this petition is dismissed as not pressed.
sd/20/03/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO
ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.2932 of 2017 Date :20/03/2017 MS/SV.MMS/SAR.2/20.03.2017/2P.5C
VINOTH SIVASANKAR VIGNESH
STATE
G.JAYACHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court