The Madras High Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. because the petitioner did not appear before the court to file any representation.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU
CRL OP(MD) No.2421 of 2017
K.RAJENDRAN ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.1
Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAIYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT CRIME NO.74 OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT
For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : MRS.S.PRABHA Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) For Intervenor : M/S.S.A.AJMALKHAN, Advocate
PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C.
ORDER : The Court Made the following order :-
Even though the matter is listed today under the caption, no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
sd/26/04/2017
/ TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,PALAIYANOOR POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.
2 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1 cc to M/S.S.A.AJMALKHAN, ADVOCATE, SR No. 21263 Arul CSL/CM-MSA/SAR-II/28.04.2017 :1P/4C
ORDER
IN
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CRL OP(MD) No.2421 of 2017 Date :26/04/2017
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.RAJENDRAN
STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALAIYANOOR POLICE STATION
J.NISHA BANU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
