Disposed

Aravind v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC26 Apr 2017CRL MP(MD)/3656/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought relaxation of conditions imposed in an earlier order. The court recorded compliance by the Government Advocate and lifted the existing conditions, directing petitioners to appear before the police as required.

What did the court decide?

The conditions previously imposed against the petitioners are totally relaxed; petitioners directed to appear before the police as required.

Aravind Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Wednesday, the Twenty Sixth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.3656 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.346 of 2017

¶6

1 ARAVIND

¶7

2 LAKSHMANAN 3 NAVEEN @ MUTHURAMALINGAM 4 PIRAVEEN 5 KESAVAN @ SHANMUGANATHAN ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶8

STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, DEVAKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT. IN CR.NO.2 OF 2017 ... RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT

¶9

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court by its order dated 20/01/2017 in Crl.O.P(MD).No.346/2017.

¶10

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.MURALI KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of MRS.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate(Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶11

Heard both sides.

¶12

2.It is submitted by the Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) that the petitioners are complying the earlier condition imposed by this court, regularly.

¶13

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶14

3.Recording the same, the condition already imposed against the petitioners is totally relaxed. However, the petitioners are directed to appear before the respondent police as and when required.

¶15

sd/26/04/2017

¶16

/ TRUE COPY /

¶17

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DEVAKOTTAI.

¶20

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶21

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶22

DEVAKOTTAI TOWN POLICE STATION,

¶23

SIVAGANGAI DISTRICT.

¶24

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶25

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.3656 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.346 of 2017 Date :26/04/2017

¶26

MKV-KKR-SAR 4/5.5.2017/2P-5C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Aravind v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aravind v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.T.Kumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Jayamurugan Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Raja Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Rajendran Vs the Inspector of Police

Nirmala Vs the Inspector of Police