P. Krishnamoorthy v. the Director General of Police

Madras HC23 Nov 2017CRL OP(MD)/17133/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court examined a criminal original petition filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking transfer of investigation to the CBCID Wing. The Court declined an interim order because the Law Enforcing Agency had already conducted the investigation and filed a charge sheet, rendering the transfer infructuous, and closed the petition.

What the court decided

AI extract

P. Krishnamoorthy Vs the Director General of… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 23.11.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17133 of 2011

¶7

1.P.Krishnamoorthy 2.P.Anushia
3.L.Meenal
4.Tmt.L.Lakshmi
5.L.Umayal
6.Murugappan.V.R
7.M.Arunachalam
8.L.Vijayakumar
9.R.Rajeswari	... Petitioners
Vs.
1. The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.
3. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Madurai.
4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID Wing, Madurai.
5. The Managing Director, P.M.C.Mercantile Private Limited,
14, P.T.Rajan Road,
A.V.R.Complex,
Madurai.	... Respondents

¶8

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to direct to transfer of the investigation from the third respondent to fourth respondent police (CBCID Wing) to further investigate the case in Crime No.28 of 2010 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ dated 06.05.2010 and to file final report in accordance with law.

¶9

¶10

For Petitioners : Mr.Sugumaran for M/s.C.Jaya Indra Patel For R1 to R4 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate For R5 : No appearance

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to transfer of the investigation from the third respondent to fourth respondent police (CBCID Wing) to further investigate the case in crime No.28 of 2010 dated 06.05.2010 and to file final report in accordance with law.

¶13

2.While entertaining this criminal original petition by this Court, decline to grant interim order. Hence, the Law Enforcing Agency conducted the investigation and filed a charge sheet before the competent Court.

¶14

3.In view of the above, the transfer of investigation filed by the petitioners has become infructuous. Accordingly, this criminal original petition is closed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

Assistant Registrar (T&P)

¶17

/True Copy/

¶18

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶19

¶20

The Director General of Police, Office of the Director General of Police, Chennai.

¶21

The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

¶22

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Economic Offences Wing, Madurai.

¶23

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID Wing, Madurai.

¶24

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶25

RMK

¶26

TE/SKN-RSK/SAR-2 : 12/12/2017 : 2P/6C

¶27

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶28

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.17133 of 2011 23.11.2017

P. Krishnamoorthy v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

P. Krishnamoorthy v. the Director General of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pethuru Vs the Inspector of Police

Subash Kannan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Vicky Alias Vigneswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

B. Amirthavalli Vs Jeyes Enterprise

K. Kannan Vs the Inspector of Police

Saravanan Vs the Sub Inspector of Police