Disposed

Noyal Raj v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Madras HC22 Nov 2017CRL OP(MD)/15399/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge order addressed a Criminal Original Petition for quashing a charge sheet. The Court, accepting an alternative plea, directed the trial court to complete the trial within six months and specified appearance requirements for petitioners without adjudicating merits.

What did the court decide?

Trial in C.C.No.5 of 2007 to be completed within six months; appearance of Petitioners 1-4, 6, 8 dispensed unless required.

Noyal Raj Vs the Deputy Superintendent of — Criminal Trial and Appeal | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.11.2017

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15399 of 2011 and Crl.M.P.(MD).Nos. 2 & 3 of 2011

¶7

1.Noyal Raj 2.Abraham 3.Puvaneswari 4.Roshma Sharma 5.Lucke 6.Glaramma 7.Vamadevan 8.Dasan Vaithiyar 9.Gopi 10.Robi 11.John

¶8

12.Nagarajan ... Petitioners/Accused 1 to 12

¶9

-Vs-

¶10

1.State represented by, The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel Sub Division, Kanyakumari District. ...1^st Respondent/Complainant 2.Prema ... 2^nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant

¶11

Prayer : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to call for records pertaining to the Charge Sheet in C.C.No.5 of 2007, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai and quash the same.

¶12

For Petitioners : Mr.M.Suresh For Respondent No.1 : Mr.K.Anbarasan Government Advocate (Crl.side) For Respondent No.2 : Mr.M.Gnanagurunathan

¶13

O R D E R

¶14

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to quash the charge sheet in C.C.No.5 of 2007, pending on the file of the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai.

¶15

¶16

2.Though the learned counsel for the petitioners raised several grounds for quashing the charge sheet in C.C.No.5 of 2007, on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai, he submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the trial Court to complete the trial within a time limit that may be stipulated by this Court and also to permit the petitioners to raise all the grounds raised in this petition before the trial Court.

¶17

I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the learned counsel appearing for the second respondent and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the first respondent.

¶18

In the light of the above said submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai, to complete the trial in C.C.No.5 of 2007, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, if the trial is not yet completed. The personal appearance of the petitioners 1 to 4 , 6 and 8, before the trial Court is dispensed with, unless the learned Magistrate feels that their presence is required for disposal of the case. The other petitioners are required to appear before the trial Court for all hearing dates without fail.

¶19

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶20

Sd/-

¶21

Assistant Registrar (P&A)

¶22

/True Copy/

¶23

Sub Assistant Registrar

¶24

¶25

The Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai.

¶26

The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel Sub Division, Kanyakumari District.

¶27

The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶28

PJL

¶29

TE/MR-KKR/SAR-2 : 11/12/2017 : 2P/4C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15399 of 2011 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 22.11.2017 (2/2)

Noyal Raj v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Noyal Raj v. the Deputy Superintendent of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Nareshkumar Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

S.Rafeeque Ahmed, Vs the Commpssioner of Police

Murugesan Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police

Mrs.R.Lakshmi, Vs Mrs.J.Susila

Mohanraj Vs the Deputy Superintendent of

M.Saminathan, Vs M.Natarajan