The criminal original petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the date of hearing despite being listed for dismissal. Connected miscellaneous petitions were also dismissed.
None granted; petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.11.2017 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15161 of 2011 and M.P.(MD)No.1 & 2 of 2011
M.Saminathan ... Petitioner
Vs.
M.Natarajan ... Respondent/Complainant
PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to call for the records and quash the complaint in S.T.C.No.5139 of 2011 proceedings on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthamapalayam.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.D.Venkatesh
O R D E R
When the matter was taken up for hearing on 16.11.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was posted under the caption “for dismissal” on 22.11.2017.
2.Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this criminal original petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are dismissed.
Sd/Assistant Registrar(CS-III)
/True Copy/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
+1cc to M/S.D.VENKATESH, Advocate SR.No.88769.
Crl.O.P.(MD)No.15161 of 2011 22.11.2017
ls
SDS/GT/SAR 4/05.12.2017/1P/4C
M. Saminathan
M. Natarajan
M. Dhandapani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
