Allowed

Murugesan v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Nov 2017CRL MP(MD)/10554/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought relaxation of bail conditions imposed under Section 379 IPC and Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals Act. The learned Single Judge held that the petitioner was complying with conditions and relaxed them. Petitioner to appear when summoned.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the conditions imposed; petitioner to appear before the concerned court when summoned.

Murugesan Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Tuesday, the Twenty First day of November Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

¶7

STATE REP. BY THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.P.PATTINAM-POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT (CRIME NO.137 OF 2017) ... COMPLAINANT/RESPONDENT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed against the petitioner in Crl.O.P. (MD).No.12157 of 2016 dated on 18.09.2017 herein by this Honourable court

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.BALAMURUGAPANDI, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶10

The Petitioner filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the concerned Court for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 379 of I.P.C., and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1967 in crime No.137 of 2017.

¶11

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 3.The Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is regularly

¶12

¶13

complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶14

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed, and the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court as and when required, on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶15

sd/21/11/2017 / TRUE COPY /

¶16

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶17

Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

¶19

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THIRUVADANAI, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶20

2 -do- thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶21

3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE S.P.PATTINAM-POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶22

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.D.BALAMURUGA PANDI, Advocate SR.No.34848

¶24

ORDER IN

¶25

CRL MP(MD) No.10554 of 2017

¶26

¶27

CRL OP(MD) No.12157 of 2017

¶28

Date :21/11/2017

¶29

rmi

¶30

SH/CM-VR/SAR-1:24.11.2017:2p/6c

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Murugesan v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Murugesan v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jose Rabin @ Jose Milde Robin Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Gopinathan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Chandrapandian @ Chandran Vs the Inspector of Police

Christopher Sam Miller Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Ganesan, Vs the K.R.Muruganantham

Kannan, Vs Muthu Irulayee