Allowed

K.Boominathan, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Sept 2017CRL MP(MD)/8135/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, in a criminal miscellaneous petition, relaxed the bail conditions imposed on the petitioner. Relying on a report confirming compliance with prior conditions and the public prosecutor's submission that investigation was pending, the court directed the petitioner to appear only upon receipt of a summons instead of specified dates. Petition allowed.

What did the court decide?

Condition to appear on specific dates relaxed; petitioner shall appear as and when required on receipt of summons.

K.Boominathan, Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Twenty First day of September Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice A.M.BASHEER AHAMED

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.8135 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10662 of 2017

¶6

K.BOOMINATHAN ... PETITIONER / PETITIONER

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAINARKOIL POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT.

¶9

(CRIME NO.168 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT / RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner vide the order dated 11.08.2017 made in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10662 of 2017, on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of MR.A.RAMALINGAM, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.RAMAR, Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police are present.

¶13

A report dated 13.09.2017 received from Judicial Magistrate No.2, Madurai, reveals the fact that the petitioner has complied with the condition from 07.08.2017 onwards.

¶14

The Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that investigation is still pending.

¶15

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of charges, the earlier condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required only on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶16

sd/-

¶17

21/09/2017

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ / TRUE COPY /

¶19

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶20

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II MADURAI

¶21

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI 3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE , PARAMAKUDI

¶22

4 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT

¶23

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NAINARKOIL POLICE STATION,

¶24

RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT. 6 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶25

+1 CC TO Mr.C.SENTHILMURUGAN, Advocate, sr.no.31243 JAM/26.09.17/PM-PN/SAR 1/ 2P-8C

¶26

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.8135 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10662 of 2017

¶27

Date :21/09/2017

¶28

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

K.Boominathan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Boominathan, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Murugan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Sureshkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Reena Vs the Inspector of Police

Jeyandran Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Selvakumar Vs the Inspector of Police

Baskaran Vs the Inspector of Police