Partly allowed

Chellamani v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Jun 2017CRL MP(MD)/4506/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In writ petitions challenging criminal charges, the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, during paragraph 21, relaxed a previous bail condition. The petitioners are now required to appear before the respondent police only as and when required for interrogation, noting their regular compliance with earlier conditions.

What did the court decide?

Relaxation of the condition to appear before the respondent police; petitioners shall appear only as and when required for interrogation.

Chellamani Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Eighth day of June Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Dr.Justice G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶5

CRL MP(MD) Nos.4506 and 4650 of 2017

¶6

¶7

CRL OP(MD) Nos.4918 and 4488 of 2017

¶8

CHELLAMANI

¶9

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN CRL MP(MD)No.4506 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD)No.4918 of 2017

¶10

1 KALYANI @ KALYANASUNDARAM

2 PANDI @ SIVPANDI

3 BALASUBRAMANI

4 MUNISH @ MUNIYANDI

... PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN CRL MP(MD)No.4650 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD)No.4488 of 2017

¶15

¶16

STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE NAGAMALAIPUDUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT, ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT (S.C.NO.172 OF 2017 IN CRL MP(MD)No.4506 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD)No.4918 of 2017) (CRIME NO.620 OF 2017 IN CRL MP(MD)No.4650 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD)No.4488 of 2017)

¶17

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD).No. 4918 of 2017 dated 24.04.2017

¶18

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.A.JAYARAMACHANDRAN, Advocate for the petitioner in CRL MP(MD) No.4506 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.4918 of 2017 and M/S.V.MAHARAJAN, Advocate for the petitioners in CRL MP(MD)No.4650 of 2017 in CRL OP(MD)No.4488 of 2017 of MR.K.S.DURAIPANDIAN, Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the Respondent in both the petitions the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ court made the following order:-

¶19

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.

¶20

2.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioners are complying with the conditions imposed by this Court regularly.

¶21

3.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the earlier condition is relaxed and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

08/06/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶26

¶27

1 THE IV ADDITIONAL DISTRICTAND SESSIONS JUDGE, MADURAI.

¶28

2 THE PRINCIPAL SESSIONS JUDGE,MADURAI.

¶29

3 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.VI,MADURAI.

¶30

4 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI.

¶31

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE

¶32

NAGAMALAIPUDUKOTTAI POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶33

6 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶34

+1. C.C. to M/S.A.JAYARAMACHANDRAN Advocate SR.No.23909 +1. C.C. to M/S.V.MAHARAJAN, Advocate SR.No.23548

¶35

GK/CMR

¶36

CSL/PM-PN/SAR-I/13.06.2017 : 2P/9C

¶37

CRL MP(MD) Nos.4506 and 4650 of 2017 IN https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ CRL OP(MD) Nos.4918 and 4488 of 2017 Date :08/06/2017

Chellamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chellamani v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Athinarayanana Moorthy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Esakki Vs the Inspector of Police

Rengasamy, Vs the Inspector of Police

Arankulavan Vs Thilagavathi

Sundarraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Savari Ammal, Vs State Rep.by