Partly allowed

Rm.Somasundaram v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Madras HC24 Apr 2017CRL MP(MD)/3457/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought relaxation of bail conditions imposed by the Madras High Court in connected writ petitions. The Court, noting compliance with existing terms, relaxed the conditions while mandating appearance for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

Bail conditions imposed on petitioners were relaxed; petitioners were directed to appear for interrogation as required.

Rm.Somasundaram Vs the Assistant Commissioner of — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL MP(MD) Nos.3457 and 3456 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) Nos.22330 and 23500 of 2016 1 RM.SOMASUNDARAM 2 MEENAKSHI ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN BOTH THE PETITIONS

¶5

1 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE(CRIME), D-1, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, MADURAI-625 002.

¶6

2 STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-1, TALLAKULAM(CRIME) POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CRIMENO.2818/2016 ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN CRL OP(MD)No.22330/2016

¶7

STATE REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-1, TALLAKULAM(L&O) POLICE STATION, MADURAI CITY, CRIMENO.336/2015 ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN CRL OP(MD)No.23500/2016

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD) Nos.22330 & 23500 of 2016 dated 24/02/2017 on the file of this Honourable High Court respectively.

¶9

Order : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.D.RAMESH KUMAR, Advocate for the petitioners in both the petitions and of MRS.S.PRABHA, Government Advocate (criminal side), https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ on behalf of the Respondents in both the petitions the court made

¶10

the following order:-

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.

¶12

According to the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the petitioners are complying with the condition imposed by this Court regularly.

¶13

Considering above said facts, the condition imposed on the petitioners are relaxed. However, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

¶14

/ TRUE COPY /

¶15

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶16

¶17

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

¶18

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶19

3 THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CRIME), D-1, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI.

¶20

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-1, TALLAKULAM (CRIME), POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI.

¶21

5 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE(L&O) D-1, TALLAKULAM POLICE STATION, TALLAKULAM, MADURAI.

¶22

6 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.D.RAMESH KUMAR Advocate SR.No.21058 rj2 CSL/CM-MSA/SAR-II/26.04.2017 :2P/8C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶25

CRL MP(MD) No.3457 &3456 of 2017 CRL OP(MD) No.22330 & 23500 of 2016

Rm.Somasundaram v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rm.Somasundaram v. the Assistant Commissioner of

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sivakumar, Vs State through

M.Thangaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Muthuraj, Vs the Inspector of Police

Manikandan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramkumar Vs the Inspector of Police