Allowed

Muthuraj, v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC24 Apr 2017CRL MP(MD)/2994/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, in a bail-related habeas corpus petition, relaxed previously imposed bail conditions on the petitioners, directing them to appear before the local police as and when required for interrogation.

What did the court decide?

The conditions imposed on the petitioners are relaxed. The petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

Muthuraj, Vs the Inspector of Police — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Monday, the Twenty Fourth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU CRL MP(MD) No.2994 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2582 of 2017

¶5

1 MUTHURAJ, 2 ANNALAKSHMI, ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS

¶6

Vs STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KURUVIKULAM POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶7

(CRIME NO.31 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.2582 of 2017 dated 09.03.2017 on the fie of this Honourable High Court and thus render justice.

¶9

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.C.R.PONNUTHAI, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mrs.S.Prabha, Government Advocate (Crl.side0 on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶10

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) for the respondent.

¶11

2.According to the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side), the petitioners are complying with the condition imposed by this Court regularly.

¶12

3.Considering above said facts, the condition imposed on the petitioners is relaxed. However, the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

sd/-

24/04/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶17

Madurai - 625 023.

¶18

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL

¶19

2 -DO-THRO THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT

¶20

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

¶21

KURUVIKULAM POLICE STATION, SANKARANKOVIL TALUK, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

¶22

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶23

+1. C.C. to M/S.C.R.PONNUTHAI Advocate SR.No.20875 SM:BS:SAR 4:25.4.2017:2P/6C

¶24

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.2994 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.2582 of 2017 Date :24/04/2017

¶25

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Muthuraj, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Muthuraj, v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Sivakumar, Vs State through

M.Thangaraj Vs the Inspector of Police

Rajkumar, Vs the Inspector of Police

Manikandan, Vs the Inspector of Police

Rm.Somasundaram Vs the Assistant Commissioner of

Ramkumar Vs the Inspector of Police