Partly allowed

Tamilarasan v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11555/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court granted a relaxation petition where a petitioner sought to reduce bail conditions imposed for offences under IPC and TN Prohibition of Harassment Act. The court relaxed the condition to appearance upon receipt of summons after hearing counsel and finding compliant behavior.

What did the court decide?

Condition imposed in Crl.OP.(MD) No.14287 of 2017 relaxed; petitioner to appear on receipt of summons.

Tamilarasan Vs the Inspector of Police — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

CRL MP(MD) No.11555 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.14287 of 2017

¶7

TAMILARASAN ... PETITIONER/PETITIONER

¶8

¶9

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SWAMINATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL, (CRIME NO. 145 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.OP.(MD) No.14287 of 2017 by order dated 31.10.2017.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.PONSENTHILKUMARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent the court made the following order:-

¶12

The Petitioner filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the respondent Police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 354 of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.145 of 2017.

¶13

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶15

¶16

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶17

sd/21/12/2017 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶19

Madurai - 625 023.

¶20

TO
1	THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, PALANI
2	THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE DINDIGUL DISTRICT
3	THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SWAMINATHAPURAM POLICE STATION, DINDIGUL,
4	THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶21

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.PONSENTHILKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.36838
ORDER
IN
CRL MP(MD) No.11555 of 2017
IN
CRL OP(MD) No.14287 of 2017
Date :21/12/2017
SMA/RR/SAR-3/28.12.2017:2P/6c

¶22

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Tamilarasan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tamilarasan v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Subbaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravi Vs the Inspector of Police

Chellapandi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Aship Rehman Alias Babu Vs the Inspector of Police

Duraipandian Vs the Inspector of Police