Allowed

Eswaran v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC20 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11457/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants a petition to relax the bail condition requiring the petitioner to report twice weekly. The single judge directed the petitioner to appear only when summoned by the police for interrogation, noting the petitioner had been complying with prior conditions.

What did the court decide?

Condition of reporting twice weekly relaxed. Petitioner to appear before police only on receipt of summons.

Eswaran Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Wednesday, the Twentieth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL MP(MD) No.11457 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.9882 of 2017

¶6

ESWARAN ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED

¶7

Vs STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GUDALORE SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT (IN CR.NO. 177 OF 2017) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.M.P(MD). No.9882/2017 dated 02/11/2017 in Crl.O.P(MD).No10811/2017 that the petitioner shall report before the respondent police twice in a week i.e., on every Monday and Friday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

¶9

Order: This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.M.SUBASHBABU, Advocate for the petitioner and Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶10

The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Charging Exorbitant Interest Act, in Crime No.177 of 2017, while granting anticipatory bail.

¶11

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶12

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.

¶13

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when require for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

20/12/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶19

¶20

¶21

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE UTHAMAPALAYAM, THENI DISTRICT

¶22

2 -do- thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT

¶23

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE GUDALORE SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT

¶24

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶25

+1. C.C. to M/S.M. SUBASHBABU Advocate SR.No.36672

¶26

ORDER IN CRL MP(MD) No.11457 of 2017 IN

¶27

CRL OP(MD) No.9882 of 2017

¶28

Date :20/12/2017

¶29

rmk

¶30

SH/CM/SAR-4:27.12.2017:2p/6c

¶31

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Eswaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Eswaran v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jeyapaul Vs the Inspector of Police(Crime)

Balakrishnan Vs the Inspector of Police

Mani @ Manikili @ Manikandan Vs the Inspector of Police

Subbaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravi Vs the Inspector of Police

R.Muthuramalingam Vs the Inspector of Police