Allowed

Aship Rehman Alias Babu v. the Inspector of Police

Madras HC21 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11552/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Relaxation petition filed by an accused to modify the appearance condition of a prior bail order. The High Court heard counsel for both sides and relaxed the condition, allowing the petitioner to appear only upon receipt of summons from the concerned court.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed by this Court is relaxed; the petitioner shall appear before the concerned court as and when required on receipt of summons.

Aship Rehman Alias Babu Vs the Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Thursday, the Twenty First day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI CRL MP(MD) No.11552 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.15173 of 2017 ASHIP REHMAN @ BABU ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED No.1

¶6

STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERANIEL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT Crime No.366/1998 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

¶7

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed in Crl.O.P.No.15173/2017 dated 20.11.2017.

¶8

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.A.ARPUTHARAJ, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶9

The Petitioner filed this relaxation petition after complying the condition imposed by this Court before the concerned Court for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 397 of IPC in Crime No.366 of 1998.

¶10

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶11

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the petitioner is regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court.

¶12

4.Considering the above said facts, the condition is relaxed and the petitioner shall appear before the concerned Court as and when required on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

sd/-

21/12/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶17

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶18

¶19

¶20

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL.

¶21

2 -do- thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

¶22

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERANIEL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT

¶23

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶24

+1. C.C. to M/S.A.ARPUTHARAJ Advocate SR.No.36749

¶25

ORDER

¶26

¶27

CRL MP(MD) No.11552 of 2017

¶28

¶29

CRL OP(MD) No.15173 of 2017

¶30

Date :21/12/2017

¶31

das

¶32

SH/PN/SAR-4:29.12.2017:2p/6c

¶33

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Aship Rehman Alias Babu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aship Rehman Alias Babu v. the Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Eswaran Vs the Inspector of Police

Subbaiah Vs the Inspector of Police

Ravi Vs the Inspector of Police

Chellapandi, Vs the Inspector of Police

Tamilarasan Vs the Inspector of Police

Duraipandian Vs the Inspector of Police