Allowed

Thalapathy, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Madras HC8 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11127/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, in a criminal miscellaneous petition, relaxed the conditions imposed by this Court on the petitioner regarding offences under specific IPC sections and the Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act antecedent to Crl OP No.14179 of 2017.

What did the court decide?

The condition imposed by the Court on the petitioner is relaxed; the petitioner shall appear for interrogation only on receipt of summons.

Thalapathy, Vs the Sub-Inspector of Police — Bail and Remand | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶3

Friday, the Eighth day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

THALAPATHY

¶7

¶8

THE STATE REPRESENTED BY

¶9

THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.237 OF 2017)

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to relax the condition imposed by this Honourable Court Crl.O.P.(MD) No.14179 of 2017 dated 24.10.2017.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.S.BALAJI, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate (Crl.side) on behalf of the Respondent, the court made the following order:-

¶12

The Petitioner filed this petition for relaxing the condition imposed by this Court for the offences punishable under Sections 294 (b), 323 and 506 (I) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, in Crime No.237 of 2017, while granting anticipatory bail.

¶13

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) submitted that the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitioner is complying with the condition regularly.

¶15

¶16

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. The petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when require for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶17

sd/-

¶18

08/12/2017

¶19

/ TRUE COPY /

¶20

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶21

Madurai - 625 023.

¶22

¶23

1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VADIPATTI,MADURAI.

¶24

2 -do- thro' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT

¶25

3 THE SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PALAMEDU POLICE STATION, MADURAI DISTRICT.

¶26

4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI

¶27

ORDER

¶28

¶29

CRL MP(MD) No.11127 of 2017

¶30

¶31

CRL OP(MD) No.14179 of 2017

¶32

Date :08/12/2017

¶33

tm SH/PN/SAR-2:12.12.2017:2p/5c

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Thalapathy, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thalapathy, v. the Sub-Inspector of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Sivasamy Vs Ragunathan

A.Saravanakumar, Vs the Inspector of Police(E.O.W)

Arasan Prabu @ Prabu Vs the Inspector of Police

A.Mari Vs the Inspector of Police

Kamatchi Vs the Inspector of Police

Erusappan, Vs the Inspector of Police