Allowed

A.Saravanakumar, v. the Inspector of Police(E.O.W)

Madras HC7 Dec 2017CRL MP(MD)/11112/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition filed to relax bail conditions imposed in a connected bail application. The court, hearing arguments from the petitioner and the government, noted compliance with weekly conditions and ordered the relaxation, allowing appearance only upon summons.

What did the court decide?

Relaxed the condition imposed on the petitioners; they shall appear before the respondent police only on receipt of summons.

A.Saravanakumar, Vs the Inspector of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Seventh day of December Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DHANDAPANI

¶5

CRL MP(MD) No.11112 of 2017 IN CRL OP(MD) No.10921 of 2017

¶6

1 A.SARAVANAKUMAR

¶7

2 R.GANESAN 3 R.RAJA KARTHIKA ... PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS/ ACCUSED 15 to 17

¶8

¶9

THE STATE OF TAMILNADU REP.BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE(E.O.W) ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, MADURAI. (CRIME NO.6/2016) ... RESPONDENT/PETITIONER

¶10

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the petition filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to relax the condition imposed on the Petitioners as per the order in Crl.O.P.(MD)No.10921 of 2017 dated 19.09.2017 and thus render justice.

¶11

Order : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.S.MANIKANDAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of MR.K.ANBARASAN, Government Advocate(Crl.Side) on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶12

This petition is filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioners, by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.10921 of 2017, dated 19.09.2017.

¶13

2.Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶14

3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) appearing for

¶15

the respondent on instructions submitted that the petitioners are https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ complying with the weekly condition imposed by this Court regularly.

¶16

4.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the condition already imposed on the petitioners is relaxed and the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police, as and when required for interrogation on receipt of summons. This petition is ordered accordingly.

¶17

sd/07/12/2017 / TRUE COPY /

¶18

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO

¶19

1 THE JUDGE, SPECIAL COURT, TANPID ACT, MADURAI

¶20

2 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE(E.O.W, ECONOMIC OFFENCES WING, MADURAI.

¶21

3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶22

+1. C.C. to M/S.S.MANIKANDAN Advocate SR.No.35842

¶23

PK/CM/SAR-4/14.12.2017 : 2P/5C

¶24

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

A.Saravanakumar, v. the Inspector of Police(E.O.W)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

A.Saravanakumar, v. the Inspector of Police(E.O.W)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijayamirtharaj, Vs the Inspector of Police

Ramar, Vs the Sub Inspector of Police

Velpandi Vs the Inspector of Police

K.Sivasamy Vs Ragunathan

Arasan Prabu @ Prabu Vs the Inspector of Police

J.P.@ Jeyaprakash @ Vs the Inspector of Police