R.Senthilkumar v. Pandiarajan
Case brief
What is this about?
In a contempt petition filed to punish the respondent for disobeying a 2015 order mandating the petitioner's promotion, the Court found that the petitioner had actually been promoted. However, the petitioner's seniority was allegedly affected by the delay. The Court closed the contempt petition but granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge the seniority separately.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; liberty granted to the petitioner to challenge the order of seniority known to law.