R.Balamurugan, v. Mr. a. Karuppasamy
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order closing a contempt petition after the respondents' counsel affirmed compliance with a prior stay order dated 07.01.2016 in WMP(MD)No.324 of 2016.
What did the court decide?
None; contempt petition closed due to compliance.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 09.10.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Cont. P(MD)No.89 of 2016 in WMP(MD)No.324 of 2016 in WP(MD)No.401 of 2016
R.Balamurugan : Petitioner/Petitioner
-vs-
- Mr.A.Karuppasamy, The Joint Director of School Education (Personnel) Directorate of School Education, DPI Compound,
College Road, Chennai-6.
- Mr.R.Meenakshi Sundaram, The Regional Accounts Officer, O/o.Regional Accounts Office (Audit), School Education Department, Madurai-625 002. : Respondents/Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order, dated 07.01.2016 passed by this court in WMP(MD)No.324 of 2016 in WP(MD)No.401 of 2016.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R. Balamurugan
- respondent
Mr. A. Karuppasamy
- respondent
Mr. R. Meenakshi Sundaram
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court