K. Rajendran v. Manivannan
Case brief
What is this about?
Court closed the contempt petition against the respondent, holding that the prior order of the Court in W.P.No.11970 of 2012 had been complied with.
What did the court decide?
Contempt petition closed; no punishment imposed on respondent.
What the court decided
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:23.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.1832 of 2015
K.Rajendran,
Technical Assistant,
106 B, Kavery Cross,
Navapatti Post,
Mettur Dam,
Salem District 636 462. ... Petitioner
Vs.
Mr.Manivannan,
Chief Engineer (Personnel) I/c,
Tamil Nadu Electricity Generation
and Distribution Corporation,
No.144, Anna Salai,
Chennai 600 002. ... Respondent
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to
punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately violating the order passed
in W.P.No.11970 of 2012, dated 12.06.2012.
For Petitioner : Mr.Balan Haridas For Respondent :Mr.P.R.Dhilip Kumar
2
V.PARTHIBAN,J. gsk
O R D E R
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
K.Rajendran
- respondent
Manivannan
Coram
V.Parthiban
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court