The court closed a contempt petition filed for willful disobedience of a previous order. It held the petition could not remain pending, granting liberty to the petitioner to exhaust appropriate legal remedies advised by counsel.
Contempt petition closed; liberty given to petitioner to workout remedies as advised.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED:23.08.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE V.PARTHIBAN
Cont.P.No.1804 of 2015
Shri.D.R.Jayaraman, Welder (Retired), No.27, Servai Manikka Mudhaliyar Street, Velappadi, Vellore 632 001. ... Petitioner Vs. 1.Thiru T.Udhayachandran, I.A.S., State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.Thiru.K.P.Ramakrishnan, The Chief Engineer, Department of Agriculture Engineering, No.487, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035.
3.Thiru.R.Padmanabhan, The Assistant Executive Engineer, Agriculture Engineering, Government Tractor Work Shop, Vellore 632 002. ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to punish the respondents for contempt of Court for willfully disobeying the orders of this Court dated 16.09.2014 in W.P.No.18874 of 2012.
2
For Petitioner : Mr.N.Naganathan For Respondents :Mr.O.R.Maheshwaran, Government Advocate
O R D E R
The petitioner has filed this contempt petition to punish the
respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed in W.P.No.18874,
dated 16.09.2014.
Court in the above said petition and the order was passed on 27.11.2014. However, it appears that the petitioner is not satisfied with the order passed by the respondents. In case the petitioner has still any grievances against the order passed by the respondents, it is upto him to exhaust the available legal
remedies as he may be considerably advised.
contempt petition is closed by giving liberty to the petitioner to workout remedies as he may be advised.
23.08.2017
Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes gsk
3
To
1.Thiru T.Udhayachandran, I.A.S., State of Tamil Nadu, Secretary to Government, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. 2.Thiru.K.P.Ramakrishnan, The Chief Engineer, Department of Agriculture Engineering, No.487, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai 600 035. 3.Thiru.R.Padmanabhan, The Assistant Executive Engineer, Agriculture Engineering, Government Tractor Work Shop, Vellore 632 002.
4
V.PARTHIBAN,J.
gsk
Cont.P.No.1804 of 2015
23.08.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition for willful disobedience of a court order should be kept pending or closed in light of the petitioner's available remedies.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri.D.R.Jayaraman
Thiru T.Udhayachandran
Thiru.K.P.Ramakrishnan
Thiru.R.Padmanabhan
V.Parthiban
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
