Allowed

Veeran @ Veeraiyan v. Kothainayagiammal

Madras HC31 Jan 2017CMP(MD)/518/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court considered an application to condone a delay of 241 days in presenting a second appeal. The Court was satisfied with the explanation but granted condonation only upon the payment of costs to a specified charitable cause.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of 241-day delay conditional upon payment of Rs.500 to a specified charity within one week.

Veeran @ Veeraiyan Vs Kothainayagiammal — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Tuesday, the Thirty First day of January Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice M.DURAISWAMY

¶5

CMP(MD) No.518 of 2017 SA(MD) No.SR5571 of 2016

¶6

1 VEERAN @ VEERAIYAN 2 V. THIAGARAJAN ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶7

1 KOTHAINAYAGIAMMAL 2 N. MURUGESAN ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶8

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 241 days in re-presenting the above second appeal in S.A.S.R.(MD).No.5571 of 2016 on the file this Honourable court.

¶9

S.A.S.R.(MD).No.5571 of 2016 against the Decree and Judgment in A.S.No.10 of 2012 passed by the Learned IIIrd Additional District Judge, Thanjavur at Pattukottai dated 31.03.2015 confirming the Decree and Judgment in O.S.No.27 of 2007 passed by the Learned Subordinate Judge, Pattukottai dated 23.12.2010 has to be set aside.

¶10

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. ANANTH C.RAJESH, Advocate for the petitioner the Court made the following Order:-

¶11

Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners.

¶12

2.There is a delay of 241 days in representing the papers. Though the petitioners have explained the reason for the delay in paragraph Nos.3 and 4 of the affidavit filed in support of this petition,since the delay is on higher side,the same can be condoned on payment of costs. Accordingly,the delay of 241 days in representing the papers is condoned on condition the petitioners paying a sum of Rs.500/-(Rupees Five Hundred Only) to the “The Bubbles' Day Care Creche” maintained by the Women Advocate Association, attached to the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai, within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ copy of this order, failing which,this petition shall stand dismissed automatically without further reference to this Court.

¶13

3.Accordingly,this petition is ordered.

¶14

sd/31/01/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO 1.THE THIRD ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE THANJAVUR. 2.THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE PATTUKOTTAI. COPY TO: “THE BUBBLES' DAY CARE CRECHE” MAINTAINED BY THE WOMEN ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION, ATTACHED TO THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI,

¶15

AAM/JM/4C/2P/SARI/2.2.2017

¶16

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.518 of 2017 IN SA(MD) No.SR5571 of 2016 Date :31/01/2017

¶17

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Veeran @ Veeraiyan v. Kothainayagiammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veeran @ Veeraiyan v. Kothainayagiammal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amsaveniammal, Vs Jeevarathnammal

Ramaiah Pillai Vs Sooriya Narayanan

Savithiri Mohan Vs Rajappa

Lawrance (40), Vs Anushammal,W/O.Jeyapaul Nadar

Ramani, Vs Kalavathy

R. Duraisamy, Vs R. Chandrasekaran