In an appeal under Section 100 CPC, the appellants obtained permission to withdraw the appeal. The court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Second Appeal dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 01.02.2017
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY
S.A.(MD)No.599 of 2013
1.R.Duraisamy
2.S.Murugesan .. Appellants/Respondents/ Defendants
Vs.
R.Chandrasekaran .. Respondent/Appellant/ Plaintiff
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree in A.S.No.73 of 2010 on the file of the learned Additional Subordinate Court, Thanjavur, dated 24.02.2011 by reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.302 of 2006, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thanjavur, dated 29.06.2010.
For Appellants : Mr.G.Muthukannan
For Respondent : Mr.P.Sesubalan Raja
JUDGMENT
The learned Counsel appearing for the appellants sought permission of this Court to withdraw the Second Appeal and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar(P&A)
/TRUE COPY/
Sub Assistant Registrar
To
Copy to
The Section Officer,
V.R Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
Ssl
sva/bs/09.02.2017/1p/4c
S.A.(MD)No.599 of 2013 01.02.2017
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal, having been withdrawn by the appellants, should be allowed or dismissed?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
R.Duraisamy
S.Murugesan
R.Chandrasekaran
M.Duraismamy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
