The Special Tahsildar(La) v. Sangan(Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Sentence short appeal petitions were dismissed by the Madras High Court due to non-payment of costs already imposed and non-compliance with stipulated conditions.
Sentence short appeal petitions were dismissed by the Madras High Court due to non-payment of costs already imposed and non-compliance with stipulated conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )
Friday, the Twenty First day of April Two Thousand Seventeen
PRESENT
The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
CMP(MD)Nos.2051 to 2053 of 2017
IN AS No.581 of 2002
THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR(LA) ADI DRAVIDAR WELFARE, SRIVILLIPUTHUR. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT
in all the petitions
Vs
1 SANGAN(DIED) ... RESPONDENT / CLAIMANT in all the petitions
3 RAJAMMAL
5 MURUGA JOTHI ...RESPONDENTS 2to5/PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 2 to 5/ Lrs of the deceased 1st Respondent in all the petitions
PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2051/17 IN AS No.581/2002:-
Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 5251 days in filing the petition to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 1st respondent in A.S.No.581 of 2002.
PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2052/17 IN AS No.581/2002:-
to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the 1st respondent in A.S.No.581 of 2002.
PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2053/17 IN AS No.581/2002:-
to bring on records the respondents 2 to 5 as legal representatives of the deceased 1st respondent and rank them as respondents 2 to 5 in A.S.No.581 of 2002.
PRAYER IN AS No.581/2002:-
Appeal against the Judgment and Decree of the Learned Subordinate Judge of Srivilliputhur in L.A.O.P.137 of 1993, dated: the 9th day of November 2001.
ORDER : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.R.VELMURUGAN, Government Advocate, for
the petitioner in all the petitions, and of Mr.A.SIVAJI, Advocate, for the Respondents in all the petitions, the court made the following order:-
The costs already imposed by this court has not been paid and the condition s stipulated has not been complied with.
Hence these petitions are dismissed.
sd/21/04/2017 / TRUE COPY /
Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023. TO
THE SUBORDINATE JUDGE, SRIVILLIPUTHUR.
JAM/26.04.17 /KKR/SAR 4/ 2p-2c
ORDER
IN CMP(MD)Nos.2051 to 2053 of 2017
IN
AS No.581 of 2002
Date :21/04/2017
The Special Tahsildar(LA) Adi Dravidar Welfare, Srivilliputhur
1 Sangan(Died)
Mari Muthammal
Rajammal
Suram Chandran
Muruga Jothi
C.V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court