Allowed

Veerammal v. Rajam (Died)

Madras HC6 Apr 2017CMP(MD)/2608/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed multiple civil petitions to condone delays and set aside abatement of appeal caused by the death of respondents. The court directed the office to record amendments regarding deceased respondents and their legal heirs as legal representatives.

What did the court decide?

Petitions allowed; Office directed to record amendments regarding death of respondents and add their legal heirs to the record.

Veerammal Vs Rajam (Died) — Madras HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Sixth day of April Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Hon`ble Mr.Justice C.V.KARTHIKEYAN

¶5

CMP(MD)Nos.2608 to 2610 of 2017 & 2638 to 2640 of 2017 IN AS(MD) No.12 of 2009

¶6

1 VEERAMMAL 2 JAYAPAL ... PETITIONERS / APPELLANTS in all the petitions Vs

¶7

1 RAJAM (DIED) NAGARATHINAM (DIED) 2 N.SELVARAJ

¶8

3 N.NATARAJAN

¶9

4 N.RANI

¶10

N.SIVAKUMAR (DIED) 5 N.MURTHY 6 KANAKAMBAL (DIED)

¶11

7 SETHU (DIED) ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS in all the petitions

¶12

8 PARAMESWARI ... RESPONDENT/PROPOSED 8^th RESPONDENT

¶13

in all the petitions

¶14

9 KUMAR

¶15

10 VAIRAM

¶16

11 MALLIKA 12 JEYALAKSHMI 13 MALA ... RESPONDENTS/PROPOSED RESPONDENTS 9 to 13 in all the petitions

¶17

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2608/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶18

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 1059 days to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 7th respondent namely Sethu and thus render justice.

¶19

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2609/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶20

to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 7^th respondent namely Sethu and thus render justice.

¶21

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2610/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶22

to bring on record of the proposed respondents 9 to 13 herein https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ A.S.No.12 of 2009 as Legal Representatives of the deceased 7^th respondent namely Sethu and thus render justice.

¶23

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2638/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶24

to condone the delay of 817 days to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 6^th respondent namely Kanakambal.

¶25

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2639/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶26

to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of 6^th respondent namely Kanakambal.

¶27

PRAYER IN CMP(MD)No.2640/17 IN AS No.12/09:-

¶28

to bring on record of the proposed 8^th respondent herein in A.S.No.12 of 2009 as Legal Representatives of the deceased 6^th respondent namely Kanakambal.

¶29

PRAYER IN AS(MD) No.12 of 2009:-

¶30

to stay the operation of the Decree and Judgment dated 30.04.2008 made in O.S.No.87 of2004 on the Additional District Judge cum Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court – 1, Trichy so for it is against the petitioners pending disposal of the above First Appeal.

¶31

ORDER : These petitions coming on for orders upon perusing the petitions and the affidavits filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of Mr.G.ETHIRAJULU PITTY PARTHASARATHY, Advocate for the petitioner in all the petitions and of on behalf Mr.R.DEVARAJ, Advocate for R1 & R3, in CMP(MD)No.2638/17 to 2640/17 , the court made the following order:-

¶32

CMP(MD)Nos.2608 to 2610 of 2017:-

¶33

By order dated 22.03.2017, this Court had directed payment of cost of Rs.2,000/-. A memo has been filed stating that the said order has been complied with. Accordingly, these petitions are allowed. The Office is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the ground of appeal recording the death of the Seventh respondent and also recording the respondents 9 to 13 as legal representatives of the deceased seventh respondent.

¶34

CMP(MD)Nos.2638 to 2640 of 2017:-

¶35

By order dated 22.03.2017, this Court had directed payment of cost of Rs.2,000/-. A memo has been filed stating that the said order has been complied with. Accordingly, these petitions. The Office is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the ground of appeal recording the death of the Sixth respondent and also recording the eighth respondents as legal heir of the deceased sixth respondent.

¶36

Issue notice to the proposed respondents 8,9,10,11,12 and 13 through Court as well as privately returnable by 26.04.2017. The learned counsel for the appellant is directed to take steps on or before 11.04.2017.

sd/-

06/04/2017

/ TRUE COPY /

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

¶41

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.)

¶42

¶43

THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CUM SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURT,TRICHY

¶44

JAM/11.04.17/BS/SAR 2/ 3P-2C

¶45

ORDER IN CMP(MD)Nos.2608 to 2610 / 2017 & 2638 to 2640 of 2017 IN AS(MD) No.12 of 2009 Date :06/04/2017

¶46

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Veerammal v. Rajam (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Veerammal v. Rajam (Died)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Special Tahsildar, Vs Thiru Paramasivathevar

Chidambaranathan(Died) Vs Chellathai Alias Chella

S.Chellappa Vs T.Joseph Benziger and 4 Others

Anwar Batcha Vs Gulam Bivi(Died)

V.Ayisha Bivi, Vs the Special Tahsildhar (L.a).

Elizabeth John Vs Dr.M.J.John