Disposed

M/S.Icici Lombard General v. K.Panchavarnam

Madras HC24 Feb 2017CMP(MD)/1715/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court allowed the petitioner's petition to condone a delay of 1023 days in filing a deficit court fee of Rs.29,940 in a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, imposing a conditional fee payment rather than granting the specific prayer.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay granted conditional upon payment of Rs.1000 by the petitioner to the Tamil Nadu Mediation and Conciliation Centre within one week.

M/S.Icici Lombard General Vs K.Panchavarnam — Madras HC (2017) — LawSathi Research

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Friday, the Twenty Fourth day of February Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and The Honble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CMP(MD) No.1715 of 2017 IN CMA(MD) No.SR14025 of 2013

¶6

M/S.ICICI LOMBARD GENERAL INSURANCE, CO.,LTD., ZENITH HOUSE, KESANRAJ, KADE MARG, MAHALAKSHMI, MUMBAI-34. ... PETITIONER/APPELLANT

1 K.PANCHAVARNAM

2 K.P.JEYAPANDIAN

3 P.PACKIAKANI MURUGAN

¶11

4 C.DARMARAJ

¶12

5 P.MARIMUTHU ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

¶13

6 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO., LTD.,

¶14

VIGNESWARA BUILDING, NEAR OVER BRIDGE, 7, PUDUKKOTTAI ROAD, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI. ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶15

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to condone the delay of 1023 days in payment of deficit court fee of Rs.29,940/-in CMA SR No.14025 of 2013 on the file of this Honourable Court.

¶16

PRAYER IN CMA(MD) No.SR 14025 of 2013

¶17

Memorandum of Grounds of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the fair and decreetal order dated 30.04.2012 made in MCOP.No.43 of 2011 on the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge), Periyakulam.

¶18

ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S. S.SRINIVASA RAGHAVAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of on behalf of the Respondents the court made the following order:-

¶19

Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH.J.

¶20

This petition seeking to condone the delay of 1023 days in paying deficit court fee is allowed and the delay is condoned, on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.1000/-, within a period of one week from today, to the credit of Tamil Nadu Mediation

¶21

and Conciliation Centre, attached to this Bench. It is made clear that if the cost is not paid by the petitioner within the time stipulated in this order, the present Miscellaneous petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶22

/ TRUE COPY /

¶23

Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,

¶24

¶25

THE MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL (ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE), PERIYAKULAM

¶26

COPY TO:

¶27

THE COORDINATOR, TAMIL NADU MEDIATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶28

CMP(MD) No.1715 of 2017 CMA(MD) No.SR14025 of 2013

¶29

AAM/BS/SAR1/2.3.2017/2P.3C

¶30

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

M/S.Icici Lombard General v. K.Panchavarnam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Icici Lombard General v. K.Panchavarnam

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanalakshmi Vs State of Tamilnadu

The Director General of Police Vs a.Arul Amalanathan

N.Kumaresan, Vs the Govt. of Tamil Nadu

A.E.Rasa Annamalai Vs M.Meenakshi

S.Dhanalakshmi Vs the District Collector

The Managing Director Vs Swarnalakshmi