Allowed

The Director General of Police v. a.Arul Amalanathan

Madras HC23 Feb 2017CMP(MD)/1712/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court considered a petition to condone a 177-day delay in re-presentation of a writ appeal filed by police recruitment authorities against an individual. The court allowed the condonation on conditional payment of court fees.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 177 days in presenting W.A.(MD) No. SR3213 of 2016 conditional upon payment of Rs.500/- within one week.

The Director General of Police Vs a.Arul Amalanathan — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2017)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction )

¶2

Thursday, the Twenty Third day of February Two Thousand Seventeen

¶3

PRESENT

¶4

The Honble Mr.Justice R.SUBBIAH and The Honble Mrs.Justice J.NISHA BANU

¶5

CMP(MD) No.1712 of 2017

¶6

IN WA(MD) No.SR3213 of 2016

¶7

1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KAMARAJAR SALAI, BEACH ROAD, CHENNAI-04.

¶8

2 THE CHAIRMAN,

¶9

TAMIL NADU UNIFORM SERVICE RECRUITMENT BOARD, OLD COP OFFICE CAMPUS, PANTHEON ROAD,

¶10

EGMORE, CHENNAI-08. ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS

¶11

¶12

A.ARUL AMALANATHAN ... RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT

¶13

Petition praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court will be pleased to Condone the delay of 177 days in re-presenting the above W.A.S.R (MD).No.3213 of 2016 and thus render justice.

¶14

PRAYER IN WA(MD) No.SR3213 of 2016:

¶15

To set aside the order dated 26.03.2013 in W.P.(MD)No.5190 of 2010.

¶16

Prayer in WP(MD). 5190/ 2010 :

¶17

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court may be pleased to issue a writ of CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS or any other appropriate Writ, Order of Direction in the nature of WRIT OF CERTIORARIFIED MANDAMUS to call for the records relating to the impugned order in Na.Ka.No. 049742/ appointment 1(2) 2010 - 10 dated 06.04.10 on the respondent and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to issue appointment order to the petitioner to the post of Grade-II Police Constable for the year 2009.

¶18

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ ORDER : This petition coming on for orders upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing

¶19

the arguments of Mr.N.S.KARTHIKEYAN, Additional Government Pleader for the petitioner, the court made the following order:-

¶20

Order of the Court was made by R.SUBBIAH,J.

¶21

This petition seeking to condone the delay of 177 days in representing the appeal is allowed and the delay is condoned, on condition that the petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.500/-, within a period of one week from today, to the credit of creche account, Women Lawyer's Association, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. It is made clear that if the cost is not paid by the petitioner within the time stipulated in this order, the present Miscellaneous Petition shall stand dismissed automatically without any further reference to this Court.

¶22

sd/23/02/2017 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

¶23

¶24

1 THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KAMARAJAR SALAI, BEACH ROAD, CHENNAI-04.

¶25

2 THE CHAIRMAN,

¶26

TAMIL NADU UNIFORM SERVICE RECRUITMENT BOARD,

¶27

OLD COP OFFICE CAMPUS, PANTHEON ROAD,

¶28

EGMORE, CHENNAI-08.

¶29

3 THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, WOMEN LAWYER'S ASSOCIATION, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

¶30

1 CC TO SPECIAL GOVERNMENT PLEADER IN SR No. 10456

¶31

ORDER IN CMP(MD) No.1712 of 2017 IN WA(MD) No.SR3213 of 2016 Date :23/02/2017

¶32

¶33

TE/CM-MSA/SAR-III : 02/03/2017 : 2P/5C

¶34

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

The Director General of Police v. a.Arul Amalanathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Director General of Police v. a.Arul Amalanathan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Veeraperumal, Vs the Secretary

D.Durga Devi, Vs Union of India

S.Mahalingam Vs the Superintendent of Police

Dhanalakshmi Vs State of Tamilnadu

N.Kumaresan, Vs the Govt. of Tamil Nadu

S.Ramachandran Vs the Superintendent of Police