Kamalakannan v. Gomathi
Case brief
What is this about?
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed two Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and connected petitions as infructuous because the respondent wife had deceased.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and connected Misc. Petitions were dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.07.2017
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.M.SUNDRESH AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.M.A(MD)Nos.968 & 969 of 2014 and
M.P.(MD)Nos.1 & 1 of 2014
Kamalakannan ... Appellant in both the appeals
Vs.
Gomathi ... Respondent in both the appeals
PRAYER in C.M.A.No.968 of 2014: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, praying to set aside the judgment and decree made in H.M.O.P.No.297 of 2009 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai dated 03.07.2014 and to allow this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kamalakannan
- respondent
Gomathi
Coram
M.M. Sundresh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court